Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSB LOST Theory Board


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 13:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

SSB LOST Theory Board

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem to be notable enough, but doesn't quite seem to qualify as a speedy. nneonneotalk 02:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Another possibility (which I raised with the original author) is to transwiki this to the Lost wiki, provided it's suitable. nneonneotalk 03:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article isn't encyclopedic enough. Dwilso  05:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage in reliable sources and doesn't meet WP:WEB. Deleted before at Articles for deletion/SSB Lost Theory Board (although as a speedy, so it doesn't qualify for G4). NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 03:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is not encyclopedic, well written, or notable. FOR GREAT JUSTICE.  ( talk  ·  contribs ) 16:53, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.