Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSCart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

SSSCart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability for the company. Essentially no coverage in independent sources except for trivial company listings. No longer a penguin (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC) No longer a penguin (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete New company, article self-soruced, producs blank news google search  delete as WP:PROMO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:51, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and there's enough consensus, there's nothing at all to suggest a 3-year-old local company would've obtained enough news sources to suggest any applicable notability including the specific companies notability. There's nothing at all convincing whatsoever. SwisterTwister   talk  22:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.