Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS Fortress Regiment 1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

SS Fortress Regiment 1

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable regiment; significant RS coverage not found. Article lists one, WP:QS source. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - WP:MILUNIT says a regiment gets a page. I think we need to swallow this one.-- Georgia Army Vet  Contribs  Talk  01:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Battalion- and regiment-sized units and larger usually get their own articles. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Regiments (even ad-hoc and short lived-ones like this) are generally notable. The name of the unit alone tells a story about the wasteful and futile attempt to use the city as a 'fortress'. Nick-D (talk) 10:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Nom's comment -- so far, none of the Keep voters have offered any sources. This looks to be an insignificant unit, created in the last months of the war. It's unlikely that it saw significant combat, and if it did, it was most likely quickly destroyed, resulting in an subject that isn't notable.
 * WP:MILUNIT does not say that "a regiment gets a page". It says:
 * "Presumption of notability for a military unit or formation depends wholly on the existence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".
 * No significant coverage has yet been offered. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.