Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SS Jairo Mora Sandoval


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ...as an independent article, fails WP:N. slakr \ talk / 03:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

SS Jairo Mora Sandoval

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD - no reason given. Article fails to credibly assert notability of the subject. All sources outside the article that mention the subject date to June 2013. Even SSCS itself claims it "will be" unveiled in August, but there is nothing since June so there is no evidence the vessel actually exists. Even a recently added reference does not mention the subject name, only "JMS 77", which is not mentioned in the article, so it's WP:SYNTH to link the two.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 04:39, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

New details emerging, statement from Paul Watson specifically naming the ship Here. Could be possible to set the article aside until we have more information E.G. confirmed picture. --Artemisni (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete for WP:CRYSTAL. Entire article mentions the name of the vessel but absolutely no details about the acquired vessel itself. It's not likely it would have the prefix SS (Steam Ship) as few steam powered vessels remain in active service. Article can be recreated if and when a vessel is actually acquired and named.  Blue   Riband►   06:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)


 * If arguing that SS is an inappropriate prefix then could also be said the Sea Shepherd vessels with M/Y prefix are also inappropriate due to non-recreational nature. Ship is in active duty already and named, only picture and specs absent which will be released after its first arrest according to Watson. Agreed that the article could be recreated then. Artemisni (talk) 03:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The existing ships are verifiably registered as motor yachts so the MY prefix is appropriate for them. There are no verifiable registration details for this vessel. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 10:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment The vessel is a motor yacht of 14m length, thus outside the scope of WP:SHIPS. She has the MMSI Number 235101489 and the callsign 2EUX3. Currently off Dakar, Senegal. Mjroots (talk) 12:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:20, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect to Neptune's Navy. Redirects are cheap and a one-line mention of the ship there is appropriate. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 16:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep; while outside the scope of WP:SHIPS, the registrant (Sea Shepherd) is notable enough for its unusual use of ships that the vessel otherwise merits inclusion. BlueSalix (talk) 21:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Notability is not inherited so the vessel needs to be notable on its own. While vessels such as the Ady Gil, Steve Irwin and Bob Barker are all notable in their own right, this vessel lacks the coverage required by WP:GNG. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 05:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.