Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STAND UP (organization)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (non-admin closure) sst✈  15:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

STAND UP (organization)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced and promotional Rathfelder (talk) 13:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag for sourcing, improvement. Certainly promotional, and just a stub, However, Stand Up gives out real money: and coverage of it exists .E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  14:05, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect and Merge to Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. On second thought.  Better to redirect and merge to the Foundation.  Pretty clear there's not enough interest in building a stand-alone article, and perhaps not enough notability to support one.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:20, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The article is not particularly promotional in its present state (link). Rather, it provides a general overview about the campaign. It is presently not mentioned at the merge target article, so a merge will improve it as per WP:PRESERVE. North America1000 17:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I honestly don't remember much about writing this stub. A merge might be reasonable, though the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation wasn't the only one involved in setting this up. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect as this seems best because this is currently questionably notable for its own article. SwisterTwister   talk  04:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.