Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STEMIONICS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

STEMIONICS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be the original research of one individual. Google search comes up with 43 results, and none in Google Scholar. ... disco spinster   talk  16:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I could not find any reliable sources; there are no books, news stories or peer reviewed articles discussing this theory in depth. As evidenced by by the few Google hits and no GScholar hits, this is a fringe theory, per WP:FRINGE, in the sense that it lies outside the mainstream of science and has few adherents. As the article seems to have been created by the same author of the theory, this article is also original research, per WP:OR. The topic falls below notability thresholds, per WP:GNG, suggesting that the article cannot survive on Wikipedia. --Mark viking (talk) 16:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete The subject of one person's PhD thesis is not enough to create an article.Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 12:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.