Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STN Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 11:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

STN Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't think this company ever reached notability, and was liquidated a few years ago. I have tried to find notable coverage but I can't find substantial independent reliable sources. -- nonsense ferret  21:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Support deletion for the above reasons. Moreover, the article has always had problems. --Langcliffe (talk) 13:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:NCORP, appears to be have been created by the company's founder (WP:COI) for promotional purposes (WP:SOAPBOX). --Drm310 (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per Drm310. I'd also like to note that the article is mostly sourced with junk references, such as the IMDB page for The Terminator. Another is just the company's main page, another is another company's main page, and the other two are dead. It's practically unreferenced. --BDD (talk) 00:13, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.