Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STOCKCAR SIM SERIES


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was : Deleted by Jimfbleak: "A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): spammy too". - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:45, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

STOCKCAR SIM SERIES

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A rFactor mod. No third-party references or evidence of notability. Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under G11 as blatant advertising. G11 is for articles which "exclusively promotes" the subject, and that is precisely the case here. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 23:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable and advertising. I don't think you can accuse it of being blatant advertising, or excessive promotion - if it wasn't for the controller suggestion it could read like almost any other game stub.  However, the fact that it's of questionable notability, and the identity of the creator weigh it for me. Rich(Contribs)/(Talk to me!) 23:35, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * (Speedy?) delete - non notable game. Also reads like an advertisement. Cyan  Gardevoir  (used EDIT!) 23:44, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Mods aren't usually notable (except maybe DotA), and this one is no exception. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:28, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.