Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STT8


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete. Closing early due to the article creator blanking the page. Also, as others noted, could have met other speedy criteria as well. Andrew c [talk] 00:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

STT8

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speculation. Alksub 01:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not only is it speculative, the author of the article even admits that it is OR. Resolute 02:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete According to the article "Investigations and research on the STT8 by numerous journalists spanning 3 continents have been going on for over 20 years, tirelessly trying to uncover deeper ties to numerous horrific events." If we can find any evidence at all that there is significant interest in this organization (if it is confirmed to exist or not) then that may be grounds for a complete rewrite, but as it stands, we have absolutely no sources to work with, and virtually no verifiability. Calgary 02:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Take it to our secret headquarters and delete. Fails more policies than I can be bothered listing, but WP:OR and WP:V are the most important. Reads like the introduction to a blog. Dbromage  [Talk]  03:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Response It is an introduction to an as-yet nonexistant blog, although in the article the author refers to it as a "bog". Calgary 03:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I think "bog" might be more accurate. The last paragraph suggests it also fails WP:NOT. Also tagged as possible hoax. Dbromage  [Talk]  03:49, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as patent nonsense and next time, speedy it. Eleland 14:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. Despite an alleged 20 years of investigations, Google News gets nothing whatsoever. If you can prove it exists then try again. Hut 8.5 18:26, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsourced hoax.Nigel Ish 21:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.