Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STUDIOdesign


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Petros471 12:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

STUDIOdesign
Non-notable company, does not meet WP:CORP. Prodded but tag removed. Lambiam Talk 06:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per nom. Article could assert importance if it is more than "Guinness used us once". --Dhartung | Talk 21:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Mukadderat 18:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:CORP. Herostratus 04:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet any of the three criteria for notability listed in WP:CORP. Insufficient sources per WP:V, and reads like WP:ADVERT.  -- Satori Son 04:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.