Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SVS-137


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:54, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

SVS-137

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

DePRODded. Fails WP:GNG - could not find WP:RS. Someone might need to check for Russian sources, but to me just seems like an experimental prototype that never went into production. Ansh666 23:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, although there are non-reliable sources which give significant coverage of the subject of this AfD I have not found any reliable sources that do the same. Therefore, although non-reliable sources can verify that the subject of this AfD exists, but lacking in-depth coverage from reliable sources the subject is not notable as defined by WP:GNG. I wouldn't be opposed to this article's recreation if in-depth coverage from reliable sources can be found.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:53, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find anything besides that gun forum, and that one is 404 too. 86.121.18.17 (talk) 20:42, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet Wiki notability requirements. The main source of information on the internet for this firearm seems to be Wikipedia itself or a Wiki mirror.--RAF910 (talk) 14:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.