Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SWAGGER Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

SWAGGER Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a magazine, not reliably sourced as clearing WP:NMEDIA's standards for the notability of magazines. Three of the six footnotes here are primary sources which are not support for notability at all (its own press release about itself, its self-published profile in a business directory and a directory entry in a government trademarks database), two more are unreliable source blogs, and the only one that's technically a reliable source is just a glancing mention of its existence in an article whose core subject is an unswag politician trying to co-opt the #swagger hashtag on social media, and even that article primarily addresses his actions in relation to the general culture of hip hop swag rather than singling out this magazine in particular. None of this is notability-making coverage about the magazine, and magazines are not exempted from having to have notability-making coverage just because they exist. Bearcat (talk) 18:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Delete. Article fails WP:GNG. An extensive search for independent sources on this subject have yielded nothing.4meter4 (talk) 20:47, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.