Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SWAG (silver, wine, art and gold)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

SWAG (silver, wine, art and gold)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Neologism, that appeared to only be documented during a small window (2011-12) so not have lasting impact -- was prodded, but PROD remover claimed newer use on commercial goods -- doesn't support its notability. Sadads (talk) 11:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a backcronym neologism that does not have widespread backing in a variety of sources to show actual notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO and WP:GNG, and per . Other than the two or three sources, it hasn't been widely used. Bearian (talk) 20:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per above arguments. (I wrote the article.) --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 09:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.