Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SWIFTest Test Automation System


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:22, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

SWIFTest Test Automation System

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional, no indication of notability. Trivialist (talk) 23:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Trivialist (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is another attempt of someone connected with company Sensiple to promote them or their products/services. This time it seems to be a Pre-Sales Executive of the company, as stated by the creator of the article in the first version of his user page. There is no trace of notability of this product on the web. There are other products called "Swiftest", but once you have learned to distinguish the one produced by Sensiple from the others, it's clear that if completely fails WP:GNG. ► LowLevel (talk) 03:45, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 00:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I have removed all the ambiguous promotional content. Please check, I have put all the references. It must not be deleted now. Amit.bhagat88 (talk) 17:27, 2 December 2014 (IST)
 * The article still reads like a brochure for the product, and does not show that SWIFTest Test Automation System meets the notability requirements for a Wikipedia article. Also, don't edit or remove other users comments, as you did with LowLevel73 above. And don't remove AFD notices from articles; doing so does not stop the AFD process. Trivialist (talk) 22:37, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Now, all promotional content from the article has been removed. The article has been checked many times and now it neat and clean, please remove the deletion tag. Thankyou Amit.bhagat88 (talk) 19:20, 3 December 2014 (IST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.140.166.218 (talk)
 * Again, that's not how it works. Why should SWIFTest have an article? Is it important or notable in any way? Trivialist (talk) 23:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, It is important. It is very unique with so many features inside which a tester would understand and its free. SO, I guess people should be aware of such tool & use it and I have seen so many such different tools' pages already created on the wikepedia. So, why not this? Moreover, I have given so many references for it, so whats the harm?  Amit.bhagat88 (talk) 11:46, 5 December 2014 (IST)
 * Please remove the Deletion tag now. :) Amit.bhagat88 (talk) 11:47, 5 December 2014 (IST)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.140.166.218 (talk)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable independent secondary sources.Vrac (talk) 01:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable and basically an advertisement. BenLinus1214 (talk) 03:50, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete SWIFTest Test Automation System fails to satisfy either WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG; the page is a textbook example of an advertisement masquerading as an article. Iaritmioawp (talk) 20:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.