Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SYKOM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 14:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

SYKOM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability for this self-published novel. Speedy and PROD disputed previously. Dolescum (talk) 18:44, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Promotional. Not even the slightest indication of notability. Tchaliburton (talk) 19:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per my original PROD analysis, an upcoming to-be-self-published novel without any sign of any potential for independent coverage. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:29, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as CSD G11 promotional only, despite the thin veneer of apparent objectivity. Otherwise, this is pure nothing, no book (WP:TOOSOON), first novel, self-published, no independent sources, two non-existent sequels, etc. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:NBOOK. --Bejnar (talk) 21:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. There's only one sentence (in the "Development" section) which crosses the grossly promotional line, and that can be easily removed. G11 standards don't depend on the subject's underlying notability, and the text would be acceptable (albeit lousy) if the book were notable. This is going to be a snow deletion; no need to expand speedy criteria to rush a foregone conclusion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 02:02, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 20 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Clearly not notable. Fails WP:GNG WP:CREATIVE etc. --Jersey92 (talk) 19:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and close In ictu oculi (talk) 04:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.