Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SYSPRO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. - Bobet 11:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

SYSPRO
Vanity NN CORP Justdoingmyjob 18:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Bad faith nomination by sockpuppets related to Wavelet.biz (see Wavelet.biz's afd history for evidence). Syspro has plenty of non-trivial, non-press release media coverage evidenced here. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 19:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability included in the article. (I agree it's a bad-faith nomination, but I would be prod'ing it right now, now that it's been brought to my attention by this single-purpose account.) &mdash; Saxifrage ✎ 20:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Saxifrage. Yes, it's a bad-faith nomiation but if closed, I would also re-AfD it at this point. It fails WP:V, WP:OR and WP:CORP -- Brian  ( How am I doing? ) 20:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as per User:Ohnoitsjamie. --Sleepyhead 08:10, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep-needs editing to avoid sounding like an advert, but fits criteria for inclusion on WP--Trnj2000 13:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like advertisement, in any case, NN CORP. 58.71.235.116 14:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment 's only contributions are to participate in retalitory afds related to Wavelet.biz afd. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral. I very much dislike the manner in which it was nominated, but it desperately needs sources other than the company's own website to establish notability. Kickaha Ota 17:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The nomination still stinks, but I'm now convinced that it should be deleted, since many phrases in the article come verbatim from the company's own corporate profile at . Kickaha Ota 20:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.