Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S Is for Space (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:44, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

S Is for Space (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per notability at WP:MUSIC. Google/Google Books confirms it exists, but not much more other than an Allmusic review. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:55, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- Acather96 (talk) 09:43, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to White Flag (band). I would normally look for an opportunity to merge in cases such as this (WP:MUSIC suggests merging and not deletion) but in this case there just isn't enough there and the tracklisting differs from the one at Allmusic (which doesn't make it wrong, perhaps the Allmusic listing is for the expanded 25th anniversary edition), where I don't see any review, incidentally, and there appears to be little in the way of available sources that can be used to verify or expand the article.--Michig (talk) 14:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC) Delete. A dab hatnote at S is for Space (the correct capitalization of the title) should suffice.--Michig (talk) 18:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No review, no sources, non-notable label. Very obscure album probably not even worth a redirect due to the qualifier, but I just created S Is for Space as a redirect. Can be included as a hatnote on S Is for Space. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * S Is for Space would be better as a redirect to S is for Space.--Michig (talk) 18:33, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Other way around. "Is" is supposed to be capitalized in titles, which is why I didn't catch S is for Space. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see that mentioned at Article_titles, which states "The initial letter of a title is almost always capitalized; subsequent words in a title are not, unless they are part of a proper name". Is it stated somewhere else?--Michig (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That passage is in reference to articles about individual things (e.g. "Criminal black man stereotype" not "Criminal Black Man Stereotype"). WP:CAPS says "In general, each word in English titles of books, films, and other works takes an initial capital, except for articles ("a", "an", "the"), the word "to" as part of an infinitive, prepositions and coordinating conjunctions shorter than five letters (e.g., "on", "from", "and", "with"), unless they begin or end a title or subtitle." Therefore, "is" is capitalized in titles of works. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, so I think that leaves us with the book article needing to be moved, ideally over your recently-created redirect, with a hatnote there pointing to the band. Agree?--Michig (talk) 18:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Has not been covered in reliable sources and can be a list item in the discography at the band's article. It does appear that the AllMusic review is for a different edition only. Also, if this album article is deleted, that will make the other discussion about what to do at S is for Space (the Ray Bradbury book) much simpler. Not hatnote or move will be necessary. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 19:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.