Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S K Srivastava


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:51, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

S K Srivastava

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article subject lacks notability WP:N per WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Cited sources are primary and or trivial and fail WP:RS. See WP:42. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note I had intended to post this as a PROD in order to give the article creator the opportunity to establish notability by expanding the article and sources. Unfortunately I clicked the wrong bleeping button and didn't catch it in time. If the article creator can establish notability I will happily withdraw my AfD nom. But right now I just don't think it meets our standards. Happy to hear contrary opinions. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep : He is working in height-est post of Government of Delhi and a senior IAS officer. So my view -article is justified, yes I agree information is very less about the person. GKCH (talk) 06:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 11:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 08:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. His post would seem to me to meet the notability bar. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, clearly notable post. --Soman (talk) 20:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Green  C  03:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.