Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S v Chitate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  12:41, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

S v Chitate

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Relies on a single, primary source. Google search only turns up results for Wikipedia and its mirrors. It seems that this case is actually less notable than a Zimbabwean case of the same name in the High Court of Harare, which set precedents over several countries and has numerous results on legal databases. But for this article, it would be most appropriate to merge with Recklessness (law). Mako001 (talk) 12:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (talk) 12:17, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The article does not show notability. I like pages about court cases but this one is badly written and shows no notability or coverage. Maybe one day the page will be well written and sourced and it will show notability. Until then delete it.Topjur01 (talk) 23:54, 24 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.