Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saab Magalona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 01:57, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Saab Magalona

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: non-notable performer/personality. Quis separabit? 10:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep:- sources available to attest notability.--Jondel (talk) 05:19, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't enjoy doing this. But the alternative is that these people get deleted. As usual, results from the first few pages of Google search, attesting to significant coverage in secondary sources that somehow the nominator didn't bother looking for before nominating: Philippine Entertainment Portal, Manila Bulletin, Adobo Magazine, Inquirer, ABS-CBN News, Scout Magazine, Rappler, The Philippine Star -- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  08:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Obsidian Soul - Sources aint perfect but notabilitys there, meets basic. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, adequate sources, sort career, but appears to meet GNG.  Montanabw (talk)  06:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep for passing WP:ENTERTAINER. Has had a number of main roles, plus has been covered in reliable sources. I'm seriously tempted to trout the nominator again for nominating several biographies for deletion with the vaguest possible rationales. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG. please do WP:BEFORE before you nominate an article for AfD. I agree with  that it is frustrating to have "justify" an article through AfD that could easily have been fixed up by yourself, or just tagged for "additional citations," bringing it to the attention of others. I feel that articles that have sources should be fixed, not nominated for AfD. Deletions create a long process involving multiple users while adding sources to an article at worst might take an hour of your time if they are the kind that  found on Google. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep and a trout slap to the nominator for filing and AfD instead of just adding a notability tag. Fix it, don't dump it.  Montanabw (talk)  05:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.