Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saad Adam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Lives of Mount Druitt Youth. JForget 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Saad Adam

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Autobiographical article about a person who has directed one local documentary. Some local news coverage of the person, but it appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:PEOPLE. WP:ONEVENT also applies here since the single movie is the only claim to notability. VQuakr (talk) 05:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Lives of Mount Druitt Youth. Delete – Notability is based on a film that appears to fail WP:NOTFILM. WP:ONEVENT applies.  ttonyb  (talk) 19:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)



 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as director does not have the individual notability his film might. Now, I was going to suggest a redirect to The Lives of Mount Druitt Youth as that spammy article might be salvagable... but it's iffy.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:54, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Lives of Mount Druitt Youth, as the article is salvagable and I am doing just that even as I come back to opine here. The director may be BLP1E for his film, but many first-time directors are... so that is not really a black mark. But as the coverage he has is in context to the film he directed, I can save that article far more easily than I can the article about him. The redirect is now a decent option.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:52, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Taking my own advice, I have now improved the article The Lives of Mount Druitt Youth to make it a suitable home for a redirect.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * A redirect seems like a reasonable solution in this case since the film article now appears likely to survive. VQuakr (talk) 07:10, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete self-publicising director of a single home movie documentary with only local newpaper cites.--Chuunen Baka (talk  • contribs) 14:33, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.