Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saara Lamberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Kurykh (talk) 20:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Saara Lamberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NACTOR. 2 of the links are dead. The third source doesn't even mention her. Only one known role and that was a minor one. Created a single purpose editor so potential self promotion. LibStar (talk) 15:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep Deadlinks have archives, so sources exist. Google search shows more recent coverage as well. While they all seem to be from the same parent corporation, the fact that these different community papers have each sent their reporters to cover this person multiple times over the years makes me consider them as sufficiently separate sources. Passes the GNG. Wugapodes [thɔk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɻɪbz] 05:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Here is a formatted citation for the link listed above.
 * Unscintillating (talk) 02:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Unscintillating (talk) 02:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as I concur there's no actual notability as an actor given the works are simply so few, and the links are only about themselves hence no actual substance for a better convincing article< therefore all we need for deletion. SwisterTwister   talk  07:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:41, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.