Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabīja (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Sabīja
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Also nominated: Previous AfDs closed as "Transwiki". Since Wiktionary no longer accepts Transwikis from Wikipedia, that decision is no longer valid and a separate discussion is needed to delete these leftover stubs. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:30, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Qalbi
 * Psychosophy
 * Thrombohemorrhagic event
 * Egersis
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - To be clear, I am suggesting we delete all five of the nominated articles. They are either dictionary definitions or translations of common words and phrases in English and amount to a dictionary definition. All of them were previously discussed at AfD and consensus was to transwiki them to wiktionary, but as that is no longer an option, the issue still remains of what to do with what's here on Wikipedia. I think the intent with the previous AfDs was that Wikipedia is not the appropriate place for these articles and that they should be moved to a more appropriate place. Being unable to move them to a more appropriate place does not remove the fact that Wikipedia is still not the appropriate place for these articles; that fact remains unchanged. Per WP:DICTDEF I think these should be deleted; I don't see these being able to be expanded upon in any meaningful way beyond what little is already there at each of these articles. Psychosophy has some content there but it's just "here's what the word means and here's some examples of the word being used by people" and does include this rather amusing error "The American teacher Scott Hamilton has trademarked the United States for his contemporary school of psychology" It's rather impressive that he was able to trademark the United States, but that doesn't indicate appropriateness for the term on Wikipedia. - Aoidh (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.