Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabaothic Cherubim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Sabaothic Cherubim

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I will gladly stand corrected by any of the music officianados who frequent these pages, but this band is not notable, as far as I can tell. They didn't have a hit, didn't release records on notable record labels, and they certainly didn't make the papers--Google News has nothing, and Google Web has nothing but fansites and YouTube. I cannot find a single significant discussion or even mention in what could be called a reliable source. Drmies (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:25, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. None of the references listed, nor any that I can find, establish notability.  The article is also the center of a walled garden consisting of articles about the band's albums.  --SquidSK (1MC•log) 04:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 00:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find anything that can be considered "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". The "best" I can come up with is the already-referenced "Indecipherable Logo of the Day" contest at the MTV Headbangers Ball Blog, but we need better than that.  Gongshow  Talk 00:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 02:40, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.