Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabbath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. This is a very notable topic and plent of sources can be found to improve the article. Remember Afd is not for clean up. (non-admin closure)  Jay  Jay What did I do? 20:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Sabbath

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Request to add citations for verification has been there for over three years and nothing has been done to improve the article since Marcocapelle (talk) 18:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow keep: very notable concept. See Deletion is not cleanup for your concerns about sources. הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 18:15, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Snow keep There are plenty of WP:RS sources on the article to justify notability. Content quality is not an issue for AfD, so I am asking for a snow close. John from Idegon (talk) 18:18, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.