Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saberov Ruslan Yuryevich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. G5 applies. Courcelles (talk) 16:44, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Saberov Ruslan Yuryevich

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The author of this article, and apparently his or her sockpuppets, repeatedly deletes the notability and other templates that established editors have inserted. In any event, Saberov Ruslan Yuryevich does not satisfy the requirements of WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, or WP:MUSICBIO. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete no Significant coverage and fails to meet notability requirements set out in WP:GNG 1keyhole (talk) 09:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 10:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. As always, musicians are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist — qualifying for a Wikipedia article requires them to be the subject of WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage in real media, verifying that they pass one or more criteria listed in WP:NMUSIC. But this cites no GNG-worthy sources at all (it's based entirely on primary sources, like Spotify and MusicBrainz and PR from his own record label, that are not support for notability at all), and says absolutely nothing about his career that would be "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better sourcing than that. And the nominator's allusion to the removal of maintenance templates from the article continued even after this discussion was opened — I found the page miscategorized without the template on it, noticed the deletion nomination in the edit history and readded the template, only to have it almost immediately reverted back off the article by the creator again — to the point where I've had to apply partial page protection to shut it down. And then they tried erasing most of the content in this discussion to replace it with the MusicBrainz link below, which is also not acceptable behaviour. Bearcat (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)


 * https://musicbrainz.org/artist/7fc25c29-a869-4887-88ad-82fa67fef547 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slavik0gree (talk • contribs)  strike sock--  Ponyo bons mots 16:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * MusicBrainz is not a notability-supporting source. Bearcat (talk) 13:55, 12 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - He appears to be one of those journeyman musicians hanging around the edge of his country's rock scene, getting gigs on nostalgia tours, filling in for someone who's sick, helping out in studio sessions, etc. But at least under this spelling of his name, he has achieved nothing beyond credits in the works of others. Not enough for an article here. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per Bearcat and a quick search for RSes...or anything besides MusicBrainz, Spotify, Amazon, Fandom, SoundCloud, or Facebook. Slavik0gree (the creator) has also created this at the English Wikinews. Heavy Water (talk • contribs) 15:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Procedural note: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NOFXXX812. One of the socks was globally-locked as an LTA on May 3rd, so any creations after that are G5able.-- Ponyo bons mots 16:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.