Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabhaktikamanuruddha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete G3  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 15:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Sabhaktikamanuruddha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The topic, a bodhisattva Sabhaktikamanuruddha appears to be unknown (Google scholar). The article tries to identify this unknown bodhisattva with Lee Kuan Yew, violating WP:NOT (promotional), WP:OR, and WP:VERIFY. It should be deleted. JimRenge (talk) 12:52, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Many unreliable sources and the reliable ones do not actually mention the bodhisattva. --Hildanknight (talk) 15:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I searched in references 11-18 and did not find the subject listed in any of them.--Rpclod (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete All sources do not actually specify anything about "Sabhaktikamanuruddha" mb12427 12:20, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Not in the sources, probably a hoax. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax. Ogress smash! 17:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsense-article.  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   19:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as obvious hoax. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 7 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Snow delete this as a hoax. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 05:09, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and Block the creator - looking through Ronggy's contrib and talk history, the user seems to be more interested in creating hoaxes than writing useful content. It's been going on for way too long. Closing admin please take action. -Zanhe (talk) 07:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * That is what I said, Wikipedia needs an urgent close account button, the Foundation have insisted that because content may be lost if the delete button is added, thusly despite requesting that the delete button is added, Wikipedia failed in looking into this request! Go ahead and kill the Ronggy account by all means! That was the original request in the first place! 林榮祥 05:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment All you had to do was stop logging in... (smh)  Scr ★ pIron IV 14:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete and block user Hoaxes are not acceptable. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and block user for creating hoax, and complete competence failure.  Scr ★ pIron IV 14:37, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Why was this not tagged for speedy deletion under G3 before? I have done the honors now, and the page was deleted by Chrislk02. JZCL 15:25, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * And you may or may not be interested in the outcome of WP:ANI. JZCL 15:27, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.