Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabino Pio Renteria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:03, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Sabino Pio Renteria

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 08:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  09:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * I consider Austin, Texas to be a large enough city that its city councillors could qualify for Wikipedia articles under WP:NPOL if they were substantively written and sourced with actual content about specific things that they accomplished on the city council — but this, as written, is a "before he was elected to city council" backgrounder that reads like a straight copy-paste or a thinly veiled rewrite of his own campaign brochure ("It was from this backdrop, that he began his lifelong dedication to community service in East Austin", "tireless", etc.) And even a politician who does hold an "automatic NPOL" role still doesn't gain an entitlement to keep that kind of article. Delete; no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source a good version. Bearcat (talk) 21:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  01:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.