Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabino Renteria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Sabino Renteria

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not particularly notable local politician, not demonstrating the depth of coverage required by WP:NPOL. Article is promotional rather than encyclopedic: when all the political advertisement ("father, community activist, lifetime citizen") is removed, what is left is fairly slim. ubiquity (talk) 20:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:42, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:42, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * In theory, Austin is a significant enough city that a well-written and well-sourced article about a city councillor could be kept under WP:NPOL #3 — but is not a large enough city that a city councillor automatically gains an entitlement to have a Wikipedia article just because he exists. Of the nine sources being cited here, three are his own website (a primary source) and the other six are not substantive coverage of him, but are merely namechecking his existence in the process of actually being about other things. So WP:GNG has not been satisfied here. And further, the article reads very much like a "meet your councilmember" backgrounder in a campaign brochure, rather than a genuinely encyclopedic article about a city councillor. All of which means that while he might qualify to keep a good article, "good" is not what this article is. Note also Articles for deletion/Sabino Pio Renteria, which was about the same person — it was a much shorter article which just asserted his existence, the end, so this is different enough not to qualify for an A7 speedy, but it's worth being aware nonetheless that the different title used this time may have been an attempt to evade the prior discussion. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable city council member. Coverage is routine and local. I was going to suggest a redirect to Austin City Council but there is no such article; guess that tells us something! --MelanieN (talk) 00:31, 14 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.