Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Dawn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Sabrina Dawn

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Fails WP:PORNBIO and no significant coverage found. Epbr123 (talk) 15:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: Cannot find any reliable sources per WP:GNG. I'm not familiar enough with PORNBIO or issues surrounding pornography-related BLPs to comment on whether she is notable within the, err, pornographic community, so my comment is only related to GNG applicability. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I mention in passing that the article is based on just two sources. One is primery - and AVN news reporting about its own award and the other a small mention in a book. These are poor sources for WP:V - and certainly no good to establish WP:N under either crieria. OrenBochman 06:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: There are a couple of Gbooks mentions, but the most substantial coverage is not reliable, and the most reliable coverage is not substantial, I don't see enough (checked GNews, Gbooks, highbeam) to evidence WP:GNG.  The particular award claim does not meet the award requirements of WP:PORNBIO under the current consensus.  --j⚛e deckertalk 19:45, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Routine case of a porn performer BLP without sufficient independent coverage to demonstrate notability. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:41, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails the current WP:PORNBIO guideline with only a scene-related award. Book mentions are not substantial enough to pass GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails pornbio - no sources discuss this nn individual in the detail required for an article. Hipocrite (talk) 19:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:PORNBIO, also there is lack of more notable works done or awards received.  →TSU tp* 14:53, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.