Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachi Wickramage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:54, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Sachi Wickramage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to meet notability guidelines in WP:BIO. The article looks like promotional material for the individual and his business. The biographical content ("Life and career" section) contains only two inline references, both of which look like they are connected to the subject.  obi2canibe talk contr 20:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Curro2 (talk) 01:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Per G11. Obviously fails WP:GNG, and looks to be a blatant advertisement/promotion of a person. WP:NOTRESUME absolutely applies here.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Obvious self-promotion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Keep per valid citations and references provided specifically regarding the World Summit Award and many other multiple award winning mobile Apps and are being loved and used by majority of populations in Brazil, USA, Cananda and Australia77.234.45.139 (talk) 12:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note. This user has made few or no other edits outside of this Afd.-- obi2canibe talk contr 19:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - The subject passes WP:BASIC:103.247.48.83 (talk) 15:51, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note. This user has made few or no other edits outside of this Afd.-- obi2canibe talk contr 19:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

,,  ,  ,  ,  , , , , , , ,AnGeloAnoJan (talk) 07:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep – The Article and the Content easily passes WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO :
 * Note. This user has made no other edits outside of this topic.-- obi2canibe talk contr 19:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Those sources are about the product/company, they only mention Wickramage in passing. That isn't the the in-depth coverage required by WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO.-- obi2canibe talk contr 12:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * AnGeloAnoJan - None of these sources assert notability of the person. These may assert notability of the company, but it is the article subject himself that this AFD thread must examine. WP:GNG requires reliable sources that cover the article subject in-depth, and that enough reliable sources exist to provide significant coverage, or coverage to where no original research is needed to cover the article subject in its entirety. This clearly does not exist; the article looks to be full of original research, and what sources are cited do not meet the standards required of WP:RS and WP:GNG.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   23:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Subject is clearly notable because of the continuing international success of the software products he has co-founded. This is reflected in the thousands of 'downloads' his software products such as FlipBeats, and Expense Tracker 2.0 , gets each month on both Apple iOS and Android platforms.169.53.164.115 (talk) 08:37, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note. This user has made no other edits outside of this Afd.-- obi2canibe talk contr 19:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep per SMART CONTENT for SMART PEOPLE this notable publicationBT Harrison (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note. This user has made no other edits outside of this Afd.-- obi2canibe talk contr 19:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * AnGeloAnoJan and BT Harrison are ✅ socks. See Sockpuppet investigations/Graham Ceca Kiwis.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - promotional material.--Kanags (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTRESUME.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.