Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin Vashist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 04:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Sachin Vashist

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability. Struggling for actor notability and does not pass WP:GNG. References also do not establish notability criteria. DMySon (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can't find anything other than the usual 'News Desk' press releases which are almost hilariously promotional. Fails WP:GNG as does not have coverage in reliable sources that can be considered as independent; press releases are, by definition, influenced by the subject and not independent or acceptable to use. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I edited this article in case it stays but I find nothing notable about the subject. Some of the references, such as imdb, are as inadequate as Wikipedia because anybody can edit them, others are self-promotion or of unassessable quality, and are probably not independent.  I agree it does not meet WP:GNG. Ira Leviton (talk) 15:36, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * delete Press releases do not make for significant coverage in reliable sources. "All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Does not meet any inclusion criterion you care to name. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:32, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with above delete voters and won't repeat what they said. Peter303x (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per above. No indication of meeting NACTOR and the subjects lacks WP:SIGCOV in independent reliable sources. -- Ab207 (talk) 04:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of reference. Press release do not work here. Bapinghosh


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.