Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sack attack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Xoloz 17:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Sack attack

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable footbag game. Even if it was mentioned in Footbag magazine 12 years ago (and the citation doesn't link to any discussion of this game), that's not enough. Also, see WP:NFT. NawlinWiki 18:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and complete lack of sources. I particularly find the "invention" claims dubious: no doubt others have thought of this same concept many times independently.  Mango juice talk 18:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment. Not sure what the 'invention' claim refers to, perhaps an older version of the article, which has since been edited. The citation is to the magazine, but unfortunately the magazine does not have its entire archives online, although I have a print copy which I could scan?  Seems like a game that was covered in a prominent Footbag magazine deserves an entry.  Hansbethe


 * Delete per nom. Cannot establish notability. - CobaltBlueTony 19:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC) P.S. lol @ WP:NFT. HA! - CobaltBlueTony


 * Redirect to Groin attack? Eleland 19:36, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Looks very like stuff made up in school one day, and without any references to show otherwise it doesn't belong here. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking any significant coverage Corpx 05:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, made up in school one day. J I P  | Talk 12:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, This office-type game (see  for more in the same line that are not on wikipedia), does begin as something made up in school one day, but I believe it has grown larger than that.  Hansbethe 20:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.