Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Heart International School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:CRYSTALBALL/WP:TOOSOON. No prejudice against recreation per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES if and when the school actually exists. The Bushranger One ping only 01:57, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Sacred Heart International School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CRYSTAL. Also title could be tweaked to be less ambiguous. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 10:04, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 10:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 10:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 00:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13(talk) 19:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not a crystal ball.—azuki (talk · contribs · email) 07:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - not sure how WP:CRYSTALBALL would indicate a keep vote. Totally unsourced article (only source is FB, an unreliable source). Crystal would indicate that this is a case of WP:TOOSOON at best.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article about a high school does not meet the notability requirement in the pertinent essay, Notability (high schools), that articles on secondary or high schools are kept except where they fail verifiability. It also fails the relevant notability guideline, Notability (organizations and companies), since this school has not yet been the subject of significant coverage in secondary sources -- the school is not even open yet. Those looking for additional articles to nominate for deletion should consider Sacred Heart Boys High School, a related institution, which only has one cited secondary source in the article. -  t u coxn \talk 19:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * "One cited secondary source" is far more than enough to pass WP:V and thus WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.