Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadakha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Sadhaka. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Sadakha

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Dictdef, promotional. Unreferenced. Durova Charge! 05:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Dicdef I tagged as such. I've seen it suggested that soft redirects can be used in these cases so people can still find the information. Seems like a good idea to me, but maybe there's an argument against it that I don't know about. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sadhaka which is the correct English spelling, has the right definition, and doesn't include the spam hook. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sadhaka without the spam. Priyanath talk 02:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sadhaka, per SpacemanSpiff. Cnilep (talk) 18:40, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.