Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadanam Krishnankutty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Third party reliable sources that establish notability as a performer merit the retention of this article Seddon talk 11:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Sadanam Krishnankutty

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ANYBIO. Laun chba  ller  22:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC) There is no doubt the person is notable and even have significant coverage! You can added these references to article. ''' C ute st Penguin (Talk) 17:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable Kathakali artist with significant coverage in mutiple reliable sources satisfying WP:BASIC. See, e.g., The Hindu, Indian Express. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Clears WP:ANYBIO without doubt. Evidence here, here and here - SaHiL (talk) 07:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep as per User:SahilSahadevan, passes WP:ANYBIO easily. XeroxKleenex (talk) 07:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.