Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadananda Swami


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-08 09:18Z

Sadananda Swami

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

it looks like it Fails WP:Bio Fewer than 200 G-hits Oo7565 19:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I did not prod this I am doing this for someone else I vote delete per nomOo7565 20:01, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable as per original PROD nomination. Gillyweed 22:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep His career as given her appears notable, and the ghits seem sufficient to demonstrate that he is well known among those of his circle. They alsoindicate that sources will be findable, as some of them refer to books in which he is mentioned.  DGG 20:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Delete - No assertion of notability. Fails WP:BIO.-- Bryson { Talk } { Edits } 17:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable enough in my opinion. Google is not the only tool out there and certainly not as useful for past people. Xanucia 22:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's badly written but we should keep it Krystian 10:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.