Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadat Husaini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 00:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Sadat Husaini

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I was originally going to speedy this, then decided against it as it asserts notability towards the bottom. However, searching Google finds no serious results either the article named person, or the references given. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 10:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC) 2. He is the former National President of STudents Islamic Organisation of India, again a well known student organisation in India. 3. The Google search is returning many links including links from many reputed news papers of India. 4. The publishers of his book MMI publishers [www.mmipublishers.net]and IFT Chennai[www.ift-chennai.org] are well known publishers of Islamic books. 5. Hi articles have been published in Tarjuman-ul-Quran [www.tarjumanulquran.org/]and Tahqeeqat-e-Islami are both very respected journals in Islamic academics. So I dont think, this deletion will be correct Sajidhyd (talk) 04:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Comment: Is the "MMI Publishers" that published his book Markazi Maktaba Islami Publishers? This is at least a somewhat notable publishing company, though this doesn't mean he meets WP:AUTHOR. A Google search for "Syed Sadat Husaini" yields very few results (and the English title of his book no results), but we should be a little cautious here, since he's primary a non-English-language subject. An Urdu-speaking Wikipedian might be helpful here.  Graymornings (talk) 10:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   —  Salih  ( talk ) 13:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Copied from this page's talk page1. He is the Central leader of a very reputed Muslim organisation in India Jamaat-e-Islami Hind that is well known through out the globe. see
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

The book "Understanding Muslim Leadership in India" (ISBN: 8188869058) contains a detail note on the subject and his interview. This is published by a very well known publisher and exporter of Islamic books in India the Global Media Publications (https://www.gmpublications.com/product_info.php?products_id=10251) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadathusaini (talk • contribs) 06:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

The confusion regarding Google serach is because of the multiple spellings of his name being used. 1. "Sadat Husaini" returns many items from independent sources like Newspapers magazines etc. His artciles like that on Economic Crisis is published many independent magazines and blogs. 2. His full name Sadatullah Husaini is alos returning links from independent sources like "Milli Gazette", Islamic Voice (known Muslim Newspapers in india and NGO sites like Vision 2016. 3. With alittle change in his name spelling "Sadatullah Hussaini' is returning around 2o links showiing his notability. 4. Similalrly Urdu search سعادت حسینی and سعادت اللہ حسینیalso returns multiple independent link.

So this should not be deleted and delete tag should be removed Intelhyd (talk) 07:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:22, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Anyone who had held similar positions to this subject in similar organisations in the United States or the United Kingdom would undoubtably be considered notable, so why should someone in a country several times larger than those two combined not be considered notable? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment (and withdrawal?) It seems the creator of the article has significantly expanded it since the nomination was put up. I have no issues with withdrawing this, but it shouldn't be long until it's closed anyway. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 21:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.