Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadbodhini boys high school


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:09, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Sadbodhini boys high school

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete another school, this one a high school with virtually no context again. There is no Sadbodhini to redirect to; no verifiability Carlossuarez46 (talk) 16:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V. THF (talk) 17:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as above or just as patent nonsense. Mystache (talk) 17:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Apparently, a school in the town of Chitgoppa in the Karnataka state of India. Even if more content is added, or verifiability is shown, a school that goes to the 10th year doesn't fall under the inherent notability exception; the equivalent would be a "degree college".  I think it's mentioned in the article about the town. Mandsford (talk) 18:48, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It doesn't say to the tenth year, but to the tenth standard. See Education in India.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  22:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Fair enough-- I looked at that and at Matriculation in India and I understand that there's an 11th and 12th standard, but that one has to pass an exam after completing the 10th standard in order to go on. I can see that the same reasons that we assign notability to 12th grade high schools-- i.e., that they are the highest level of education within the school district -- might apply if a certificate is conferred on persons who complete the 10th standard. Mandsford (talk) 01:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Detele per WP:V. Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 18:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —Cunard (talk) 22:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Chitgoppa if it can be verified that this school exists; if no sources can be found, then weak delete. I've done some searches, but I can't find anything to verify this school's existence. Cunard (talk) 22:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep since this school's existence has been verified by Mgm. All high schools are notable. Cunard (talk) 18:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep if it can be verified that this school exists; high schools are notable on Wikipedia. That includes Indian high schools as well as ones in Western democracies.  See also WP:CSB.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  22:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As sources don't exist it doesn't meet WP:V or WP:ORG. Nick-D (talk) 07:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete By googling I was able to find a directory listing to prove it exists, but existence isn't enough. Articles on Wikipedia need content. There are not enough sources to pull content from. - Mgm|(talk) 10:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If you can verify the existence of this school, this article should be kept because all high schools are notable. At the very least, what is the harm of merging/redirecting this school to its geographic location? The article has a little context: "class rooms from 8th Standard to 10th Standard" which can be merged. Cunard (talk) 18:53, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I'm unable to repeat the search query that got me my previous result. It wouldn't have been a good source anyway, since it only gave an address, the actual article content we have couldn't be verified with it. -- Mgm|(talk) 23:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

KEEP & improve/expand. the existence of the school has been verified apparently, if you read thru this whole debate. it's not very good as is, i admit, and needs work, but if we have a policy that high schools are noteworthy enough to have individual articles, per se, then this qualifies. did anyone think to look & see if the school has a website.
 * Delete We can't verify if this school exists, let alone what city/country it is in. (and variations) draws a blank; for all we know, this is a hoax. Abecedare (talk) 02:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

also, why are the "decision was delete, archived, etc" notes already on the text of this page? the debate is NOT closed, & the article has not already been deleted. it's very confusing to see that, when you go to write a comment. Lx 121 (talk) 00:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

ok, in the very brief time it has taken me to write the above comment, the debate has been closed & the article deleted. that seems to be jumping the gun a bit. this was not a CSD Lx 121 (talk) 00:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Last word, i wouldn't normally do this, but i want it on the record. after extensive searching:  it is almost certainly "Sad Bodhini". two words, not one, at least in roman scriptLx 121 (talk) 03:33, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.