Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saddam Hussein in U.S. popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 17:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Saddam Hussein in U.S. popular culture


WP:OR. Ai-teyfw 13:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as original research. TheRanger 14:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete unsourced TV-cruft. Kavadi carrier 15:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 23:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR.-- Hús  ö  nd  01:49, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hang this OR with him. TTV (MyTV|PolygonZ|Green Valley) 03:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep! South Park's reference alone make this article significant! Wikipedia has been delete happy as of late and I fear that many contributor's hard work will discourage participants and will detract from our ability to catalog human knowledge, the purpose of an encyclopedia.  Cheers, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 03:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, no need for this. Any notable appearances will be described with the show in question anyway. Seraphimblade 03:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOR. Do we really need an article on this? Can't it be mentioned in the Saddam Hussein article (if referenced)? -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 04:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This article was originally split from Saddam Hussein due to length issues.  Deleting this article will result in the content getting shuffled back in to Saddam Hussein and will detract from the tone of that article IMHO.  Thatdog 06:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Trying to prevent the content from appearing the Saddam Hussein is not a valid reason to keep this article. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 22:33, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please see WP:SIZE, there are valid reasons for article forks. hateless 02:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, because I think Thatdog makes a good point. --164.107.92.120 21:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, AFD is not cleanup. hateless 02:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with ZimZalaBim. This isn't exactly a POV fork (a cruft fork?) Most of the content should just be deleted rather than merged into the main article.--Cúchullain t/ c 03:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.