Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sade Aiyeku


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Idaho USA. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  09:04, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Sade Aiyeku

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Aiyeku is only notabel for being Miss Idaho USA. The only coverage we have of that outside of pageant-related media is an article from her home town paper in Walla Walla, Washington. This is just not the level of coverage we need for an article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:27, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The article now meets GNG, since I have a reliable sources to establish notability. The article might need further editing, but it is not a junk bio and is best kept. Deletion should be a last resort. Eruditescholar (talk) 07:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per WP:HEY and WP:BARE. Bearian (talk) 22:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Miss Idaho USA; the subject is otherwise not notable, but I believe there's some "list notability" since the article exists and the subject is mentioned there. Individually, she fails GNG due to lack of significant coverage. The coverage is only local and rather trivial. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:59, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added another reliable source. I deem the Miss USA contest a notable American pageant, including prelimnaries to the Miss America contest which she also contested in. Besides, there are many other articles on former Miss USA contestants following the year she contested. The article also passes WP:ANYBIO because she "received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for others several times". Eruditescholar (talk) 09:30, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * {| style="background:#AADDFF"



Any biography

 * 1) The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times.
 * 2) The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.


 * }
 * Above is from ANYBIO, which is relevant here. Further, applying ANYBIO #1 to a state-level pageant win seems like a stretch as these are no "widely known and significant award". If they were, there would have been coverage sufficient enough to establish individual notability of a winner. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, I deem existing online sources sufficient to establish notability. Besides, I am sure there will be other offline sources somewhere. Moreover, I consider a state-level peageant winner an achievement in it's own right, but considering a delegate to a major national pageant as non-significant? I don't think so. -Eruditescholar (talk) 19:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment –If found to not be independently notable, redirect to Miss Idaho USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America1000 16:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Discussion about notability guidelines has already started on the Talk page for the Beauty Pageant project.  No harm will be done by closing this nomination as "keep" and letting the project-level discussion take its course.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:57, 17 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.