Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadeq Al-Ahmed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Sadeq Al-Ahmed

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another in a line of Soccerway mirror articles created by long-term vandal Mhsohaib. While he has participated in 3 games of professional football, his playing time is only 32 minutes, which is less than half a game of football. He has played in a cup game but not while playing for a WP:FPL club at the time.

Searching "صادق الأحمد" yielded very little coverage and none of it seems to be significant. I found a transfer announcement in Ar Riyadiyah, which is one sentence long. I then found trivial mentions in Al Yaum and Al Riyadh. None of this demonstrates WP:GNG. Consensus is that such articles should be deleted unless significant coverage can be demonstrated. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 12:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. I was unable to find any WP:SIGCOV to satisfy GNG and as such, as is consensus at WP:WINNEROUTCOMES, this should result in delete. GauchoDude (talk) 13:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.