Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadhu Sundar Selveraj


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete, unverifiable bio. RasputinAXP  c  20:19, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Sadhu Sundar Selveraj
Claim of notability is, er, a miracle. I think this violates our verifiability policy. Chick Bowen 04:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. mg e kelly 04:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, I ran a Google search on this man ("Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj" is the more common spelling), and he seems to be a well-established international evangelist with several mentions from evangelical religious sites and a few books published. The article, as it stands, is not WP:NPOV, but it could be cleaned up into a more autobiographical piece. We have articles on equally unknown American evangelists such as Beth Moore; I don't see why we should delete this one.--Marysunshine 04:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Completely rewrite and rename: his name is Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj. Still, a Google search indicates to me that he's a notable person: .  Let's get that unverifiable miracle out of the article ASAP.  --Hyperbole 05:02, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Well, I'll concede that I didn't notice the spelling issue, and thus was getting many fewer google hits.  However, looking down your list I'm not really finding anything I'd consider a reliable source.  If this can be rewritten, let's rewrite, but how would you propose we get started?  Chick Bowen 06:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Emphatic Delete to this. Not opposed to recreation of a normal article on the evangelist. This stuff is pure WP:VSCA - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 14:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Essentially a rewrite of this page. G  y  re  00:28, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notable person, name misspelled, written in spam form, unless someone is willing to rewrite it it's got to go. They can come back and rewrite it correctly.--Nick Y. 01:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.