Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadhu sivaraman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:56, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Sadhu sivaraman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Autobiographical. Extensively edited by single-purpose-account who appears to also be the subject. Have tried to explain nature of problems and pointed out they mustn't edit or create an article on themselves. They are trying extremely hard to produce references (using copyvio uploads of newspaper scans!) but my own searches aren't producing anything to show independent notability. I can't read the language in the newspaper scans (and won't even try to guess which of the Indian languages it is). This page was nominated for deletion as an unsourced bio - the subject eventually removed the nom at the very last second so I am bringing this for discussion and to try and establish whether this seer is notable. Mabalu (talk) 09:12, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Clarifying - While the newspaper scans may well demonstrate notability, I'm not convinced from the translated titles that notability is to be found. If this is the best we can get by way of references, it's not promising. Mabalu (talk) 09:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  11:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  11:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete agree with Mabalu; we shouldn't have to do acrobatics to find RS BlueSalix (talk) 04:07, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject is notable, but biography of living person requires sources that can be accessed. Whenever these sources will be questioned, we will have nothing for a say. Bladesmulti (talk) 10:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.