Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadia Khan (model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus to delete after relisting. I discount the WP:BEAUTIFUL, WP:HOT !vote. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Sadia Khan (model)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. She has appeared in just a few serials. No significant coverage and no award wins. Musa Talk ☻ 22:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 22:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 22:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 22:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 22:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: WP:BEAUTIFUL, WP:HOT  Sh eri ff  |  ☎ 911  | 01:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the above comment cannot be taken seriously and this current t article is not better satisfying WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister   talk  02:44, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * But, I like her, you got to give a favor to your fellow Wikipedian. :)  Sh eri ff  |  ☎ 911  | 19:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment did she have the lead or top three in those serials, imdb says so but is unreliable?Atlantic306 (talk) 19:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * She had a lead role at least in one serial that I know off.  Sh eri ff  |  ☎ 911  | 19:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to be a WP:GNG failure. I can find primary sources, non-reliable blogs & fan sites, but no significant coverage in sources that would help establish notability. --Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 06:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:NMODEL which covers both her careers. Legacypac (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't seem notable. Also, the references seem dubious. Rollingcontributor (talk) 07:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.