Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadiqabad Chak 152P (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Bradjamesbrown (talk) 07:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Sadiqabad Chak 152P
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unreferenced stub having no assertion of notability of the subject. I even believe this could fall under WP:CSD criteria A7 if it covered places. Ham tech  person  03:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Hard to say if it is or was an actual population center.  Can't find much.  A preview of this book (don't have access to the full text) indicates it's some kind of place.  But is it a village?  A parcel of land?  This might be the incorrect English/Latin spelling of an Urdu word.  I don't know.--Oakshade (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * We have an article on that. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  Eastmain (talk • contribs)  08:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added two references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as a verifiable village. The search snippet view shows that this is a census village, but I can't read the preview, this (#83) shows it's a village with 1515 registered voters. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources added and found by Eastmain and SpacemanSpiff.--Oakshade (talk) 19:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: Verifiability is a lower standard than notability. Ham  tech  person  02:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC) Also, I'm removing the unsourced 2005 population estimate  Ham  tech  person  02:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep As a real village it is inherently notable.Edward321 (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.