Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadullah Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 22:41, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Sadullah Khan
Fails Notability_(academics). Self-promotional, WP:VANITY. No sources. - Motor (talk) 11:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn topic, poorly made article. 169.231.23.121 22:18, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable (on a broad scale) in any of: Business; Academic; Religious. Ted 02:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn and clearly WP:VANITY. -- DrunkenSmurf 19:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. This is not a very well written article by any means; there's a certain style of Islamic articles, especially bios, that read in this tortured way.  But they can be improved, it's a stylistic flaw not substantative.  However, I have heard of (and skimmed a couple times) the column “Ask the Imam” for Beliefnet.com, written by Khan.  I'm certain that column had a readership well over 5000.  That meets the "author test".  Moreover, the article at least claims that he was a co-founder of a notable university, which seems to easily meet the "professor test".  Please, closing admin, don't close this as delete with so few votes... either let the article improve under "no consensus", or at least extend the AfD to get more input.  LotLE × talk  06:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.