Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saeed Aasi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 07:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Saeed Aasi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not establish notability that is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other and independent of the subject, and the subject has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. The cited sources are not WP:reliable sources and most sources are trivial coverage or subject's own websites or written articles by subject self, there is no any article that is written by third party. Justice007 (talk) 15:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - if this person is so famous, why are there no reliable sources discussing him? You can't just say somebody is famous, without some solid evidence. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  02:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Urdu find sources template. Unscintillating (talk) 00:45, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I had already searched, there were no any reliable sources to save the article. Justice007 (talk) 05:59, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:50, 24 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.