Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saeed Reza Khoshshans (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Saeed Reza Khoshshans
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Refund requested after soft deletion so here we are again. Two editors in support of deletion and no support for keep in the first AfD so hopefully we can get a bigger consensus here. As before, the subject does not qualify under WP:GNG, as the sources (both in article and in BEFORE search) appear to be affiliated with the author, press releases, or trivial mentions. (One source might qualify, but we need multiple.) The subject also does not meet the criteria of WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NWRITER. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Soft deletion is not an option. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Theatre,  and Iran.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  03:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Still no sources found. This is about all I can find, which does not help notability. Even what's in the article now isn't enough. Oaktree b (talk) 00:13, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: This article should be deleted as it fails to meet the WP:GNG notability guidelines. Most sources are either affiliated with the subject or are press releases, offering only trivial mentions that do not establish the subject’s notability. Furthermore, it is essential that the subject meets the notability criteria of either WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NWRITER. More coverage is needed from reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic. AstridMitch (talk) 04:29, 19 June 2024


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.