Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safaree Samuels


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Safaree Samuels

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMUSIC. WP:NOTINHERITED, as his notability is entirely reliant on Nicki Minaj. He gets one mention in her article, so I'm not inclined to redir for trivia. MSJapan (talk) 05:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:34, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as I also happened to encounter this article, nothing at all actually suggestive of independent notability by all means. SwisterTwister   talk  17:36, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete notability is not inherited, just because someone dates a notable person does not make them notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete This is classic BLP1E. I don't think a redirect is appropriate here either considering that it is based on the subject's personal life. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 16:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The individual may make something of himself in the future (or not) that merits sources devoted to him. Until then, there just is not anything deserving of an article or a redirect.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.